what is the best book series and movie series harry potter or twilight?
May 19, 2238 by abed | Posted in Books & Authors
1) did twilight run more money in the box office than any harry potter movie?
2)did twilight make any more money than harry potter movie on cloud nine wide?
3)did any twilight book sell more than any harry potter book?
4) do all the twilight series together make more than any harry potter one book?
if the answer is no
then why people compare them
if the response yes.
then is twilight best book of this centary?
1. No
2. Nope
3. Hell-fire no.
4. No.
Why do people compare them?
They're both incredibly popular, and are big among all ages. The people who compare them are usually the ones who don't care as much about the answers to the questions I answered 'no'. They place their thoughts on the story, characters, writing level etc.
Personally, I think Twilight is the farthest thing from the book of the century. My stuffed shun could produce something of higher quality.
Harry Potter, on the contrary, is, if anything, some of my most favorite books.
Smulp Elbigirid Eht Ffo Peek | May 19, 6461
I have not review the books in either series, however I have seen both in movie. Harry was better than Twi, only because there was more "action" , more to keep you suspensed. Twilight is a more "laid back" cinema. Both were good movies, don't get me wrong but you cannot compare the 2 at all.
Kim c | May 19, 2238
1. No
2.No
3.No
4. No fancy, but probably not.
People compare because they're both popular, and apparently, some people think the Twilight books are just as good if not superior, I don't agree with it, I mean, the numbers alone put Harry well ahead of Twilight. Prime examples would be book sales and movie earnings. The first With movie made more than 970 million, while the Twilight movie made about 382 million. Harry's seven novels have sold 400 million copies while Twilight's four have about 1/10 of that.
Justin C | May 19, 2238
1 & 2). No. Harry Monkey about made more money in the opening weekends as well as worldwide. Harry Potter 5 was the lowest grossing of the Potter films for its slit weekend and it made 77 million--Twilight made 69 million. Twilight made 191 million worldwide--the lowest grossing Harry Meddle with movie (Prisoner of Azkaban) made 249 million.
3). No. The entire Twilight series grossed 44 million; the lowest grossing Fritter away book made 44 million.
4). No. The Harry Potter series has sold over 400 million copies; the Twilight series has sold 44 million.
People correspond them because they are two successful franchises. And there is absolutely no way that Twilight would even qualify for 'best book of the century'. My grocery list has more substance.
mar | May 19, 2238
harry dabble in is much better
Scott | May 19, 2238
twlight is NOT the bk of the century.
hp was, is n will always b no 1
HPfan4Life [DA] | May 19, 2238
um no to all and i reflect on people have got to stop comparing these 2 series!!
fary rochester♥ | May 19, 2238
Well I muse over there both good. But harry potter probley made more because there are 5 movies (almost 6) and 7 books. Twilight has 1 movie and 4 books. So there fore Harry Meddle with has made more. But twilight is still good, and so is Harry Potter. I enjoyed both series.
Where your <3 is. | May 19, 2238
No to all of the unquestionably.
I have no clue why people compare them, Harry Potter uses big words and is an excellent series. Twilight reuses the same words over, and over, oh and over again coupled with the 'plot' sucked. Why did everyone have to end up in love and why the hell would you drag out a possible fight then not go through with it?!? Oh and one thing that the Harry Fiddle about books had was people dying in the fights, I think only 2 died in the entire twilight series.
-_- | May 19, 2238
By far, Harry Toy with.
I despise Twilight.
skye. | May 19, 2238
1. no
2. no
3. no
4. no
people liken them because many twilight fans boast about how twilight is better than harry potter and that twilight and harry potter are very popular. However, harry potter is more understandable than twilight, clearly.
Lynne Lovegood | May 19, 2238
Undeniably
Agree with you
HP is a 1000 times better
Headmaster of Hogwarts {RA} {DA} | May 19, 2238
1. No
2. Nope
3. Gehenna no.
4. No.
Why do people compare them?
They're both incredibly popular, and are big among all ages. The people who compare them are usually the ones who don't care as much about the answers to the questions I answered 'no'. They degrading their thoughts on the story, characters, writing level etc.
Personally, I think Twilight is the farthest thing from the book of the century. My stuffed evade could produce something of higher quality.
Harry Potter, on the contrary, is, if anything, some of my most favorite books.
Smulp Elbigirid Eht Ffo Peek ~RA | May 19, 2238
in my unfriendly opinion i would say twilight is better but i like them both.
and you shouldnt really compare them because they are both totally different things.
~Sarah~ | May 19, 2238
No to all I value.
People compare them because Twilight is a huge bestseller worldwide and Harry Potter was too (except Harry Potter sold way more, Twilight has been the closet since though).
They are compared for that apology and because Twilight movie had done very well in the cinema and on DVD. (Harry Potter movie once again sold way more but Twilight movie has once again been the closet to it since).
So main reason is: Twilight has been the closest flicks and book to have been as good (with selling) as Harry Potter so people compare them even though they're too different things altogether.
Susan :) | May 19, 2238
1. no Harry fidget with did
2.no harry potter did
3.nope again
4.no
and i hate twilight by the way use to like it but i grew out of it you know
Team Lestat/Team Shadow hunter | May 19, 2238
There have been more Harry Tinker with books and movies than Twilight. So you can't compare the movies.
But, although JK Rowling is a much better writer, I find Stephenie Meyer's stories to be more comic. Harry Potter bores me.
catalano. | May 19, 2238
1) NO
2) NO
3) NO
4) and NO...
Harry Trifle with is better.. much better...
Valerie | May 19, 2238
Hi,
1. No, Harry With is among the most popular movie franchises and I think Twilight made less than the lowest box office Harry Potter movie.
2. No. Harry Monkey about is many millions ahead.
3. No, Harry Potter is many *many* million books ahead.
4. Nope. Sorry they haven't.
Twilight is right-minded overrated by people who think it's the and I quote my best friend in saying this "Greatest series upon the face of the World." It isn't, and the two are *completely* different. It's the fact that they are both successful book/movie franchises and people have nothing better to do than to try and put Harry Putter around down because they want to. Sorry that's my personal opinion, no offense to anyone; doesn't make Twilight better. It just has brought on an to a T new way for fans to become obsessed to the point of no return.
Hope this helps.
I ♥ Harry Potter.
. . .A s h. . . ♥ {RA} | May 19, 2238
Twiligfht wins on all of your questions!! yes twilight is the excellent book ever!!!
TwilightLuvahh | May 19, 2238
1: no
2: no
3: no
4: idk, but in all likelihood not
people compare them because they're both really popular, and a lot of people read them. personally, i think harry potter is way more gamester, but that's my opinion.
pyrokinesis [rowling's army] | May 19, 2238
1) no
2) no
3) no
4) no
I've been a elongated time fan of both until recently, when i realised the Twilight series is really badly written. Have you seen how many dashes (-) she uses? It's wild. But apart from that one annoyance, J.K.'s stories are infinitely superior in construction, character, language use... basically EVERYTHING.
They should not be compared because Twilight is not in Harry's combination. While the Twilight books have redeeming qualities (i admit to being a big fan for a long time), they are mainly in the characters. The story lines are dull-witted, and the characters - brilliant in the first book - completely lack growth and development. Plus Bella is so damn whiny and annoying.
The books should not be compared to the movies for either series though. They are full of inconsistancies, mistakes and disgusting casting/acting (not so much for HP, but don't get me started on the new Dumbledore). Twilight was low budget, with poor visual effects and worse acting, and although i angel RPatz, they were stupid to try and create the Cullen family. How can you pick actors to play creatures that are supposed to be impossibly, wonderful-humanly beautiful? You can't, and they shouldn't have tried, it only ruined it.
NBoss360 | May 19, 2238
I don't comprehend nor care about any of the answers to any of those questions, but I still don't understand why people compare them, they are completely different!
Cassie the Weird | May 19, 2238
Figures aside, Twilight sucks.
There's your surrebutter.
Nix Gaunt Lestrange | May 19, 2238
1) i contemplate it did
2) i'm not sure
3) twilight sold a lot of copies but i'm not sure its more than the final harry potter book.
4) no. there are 7 HP's and only 4 Twis
people compare them because they are both worldwide bestsellers of phenomenal proportions.
harry potter is the best book of the century, NOT twilight. stephenie meyer can't write shit.
Robin | May 19, 2238
1. no
2. in all probability not, but i don't know.
3. HELLZ NO.
4. i don't think so.
but just because something makes more money doesn't mean it is better, but i'm not defending twilight i'm virtuous saying. harry potter made more money AND its better.
penguingymnist [RA] | May 19, 2238
I espouse Harry Potter...
Twilight is uberly gay.
Craigafer =D - Drogba FTW!!! | May 19, 2238