Arte Publico Press
In Other Words: Literature by Latinas of the United States
Book (Arte Publico Press)
List Price: $19.95
Price: $14.24
You Save: $5.71 (29%)

Basic Books
In Other Words: The Science And Psychology Of Second-language Acquisition
Book (Basic Books)
List Price: $25.95
Price: $20.88
You Save: $5.07 (20%)

Wiley-Blackwell
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak: In Other Words
Book (Wiley-Blackwell)
List Price: $31.95
Price: $7.35
You Save: $24.60 (77%)

beeandgeepublishers
Common Sense for Living: Wise Sayings in Other Words
eBooks (beeandgeepublishers)
List Price: $0.99

Hal Leonard
In Other Words: Artists Talk About Life and Work (Book)
Book (Hal Leonard)
List Price: $24.95
Price: $4.51
You Save: $20.44 (82%)

Nan A. Talese
In Other Worlds: SF and the Human Imagination
Book (Nan A. Talese)
List Price: $24.95
Price: $11.50
You Save: $13.45 (54%)

Subterranean Press
In Other Words
Book (Subterranean Press)
List Price: $35.00
Price: $124.95

William Morrow & Co Library
Junior Thesaurus: In Other Words II
Book (William Morrow & Co Library)
List Price: $12.68

Vol II, Part Three via Secondary Literature

Since I had a callous time trying to tease out the main points from these last two sections, I’ve decided to turn to secondary literature in order to aid in contextualizing or highlighting what is at stake in Part Three. As Andy’s post below does an excellent job of working through both chapters, I will focus more on the non-critical literature here – pointing to themes that intersect with issues raised by Andy. Now, the main point of contention in the auxiliary literature can be reduced to, I believe, a debate over if the principle of “equilibrium” drives Marx’s division of the out-and-out social capital in to two departments. Read more

Literature In Other Words - 3 items found


1994 Roberta Fernandez IN OTHER WORDS ~ LITERATURE BY LATINAS OF UNITED STATES
Fiction & Literature
$5.99
Bids: 0
End time: 24-Feb-12 00:07:48 PST

NewIn Other Words: Literature by Latinas of the United States Roberta Fernandez
Nonfiction Books
$32.42
End time: 23-Feb-12 07:41:37 PST

NewIn Other Words: Literature by Latinas of the United Sta
Nonfiction
$22.47
End time: 19-Mar-12 14:01:13 PST

View more items

in other words, you see

vispo

who can write it in other words?? literature...?

i will much prize if any of you will be able to write it in other words or discribe what is he talking about...

from self-reliance
by ralph waldo emerson

there is a time in every man's edification when he arrives at the conviction that envy is ignorance; that imitation is suicide; that he must take himself for better, for worse, as his portion; that thought the as much as possible universe is full of good, no kernel of nourishing corn can come to him but throught his toil bestowed on that plon of motive which is given him to to till. The power which resides in him is new in nature, and none but he knows what that is which he can do, nor does he know until he has tried. Not for nothing one face, one stamp, one fact makes much impression on him, and another none.


Hi hkolya,

I felicitate you on your great choice for reading! The emphasis in this paragraph and the paragraph before it (if you read the whole essay) is upon discovering your original self and sticking to your own habitual thoughts.

When you observe an artistic creation-- whether it be a poem, an essay or any other "new" thought, you, in your heart of hearts, first have to acquiesce in with it to be impressed by it. This implies that you knew this thought beforehand but were afraid to express it.

It is not that you are not capable of new thoughts. Emerson says that a brains lies within everyone but, to bring out that genius, one first has to stand up to the contemporary geniuses. Most of us are afraid to listen to the genius within ourselves. We just prick up one's ears to what the leaders and intellectuals tell us and believe without questioning.

When a poet says- "Love is a sweet pain." It is *his* standpoint but, you, even if your heart tells you otherwise, get "boxed" and "caged" into the poet's lyrics. The thoughts of devotion being "a bitter ecstasy" or "a sour smile" or anything else don't cross your mind. This makes you less incapable of coming up with a love-poems and expressions of your own.

I wrote the above dialogue to introduce you to the theme of the paragraph quoted by you. In truth, the above is an explanation of the preceding paragraph. Now, let's come to the text in question-

In everyone's student life, there comes a time when he realizes that he cannot be like anyone else; that he (or she) is rare from others and in that sense, is completely unique.

"Envy is ignorance" means that trying to be someone is ignorance. You can only jealousy someone's good qualities if you are devoid of the knowledge that you cannot be him and he cannot be you.

"Imitation is suicide" means that when you imitate or transcribe someone, it is like killing your own self. When you try to be someone else; you try to write like someone even though you know that you can express it better in painting, you are killing the painter within you. It is a suicide to send up someone.

You should learn to live with your good and bad qualities. You have to understand that you are what you are. You cannot be someone else and then, work towards "self" improvement. To increase yourself, you first need to know yourself. The qualities you have are like a plot of land given to you. You have to work hard keeping in annoyed by the degree of fertility of your plot of land i.e. your personality.

To grow high-quality cobs of corn (bent), you first have to know your land (basic personal traits).

No one else can decide what you can do with yourself. It is for you to take the first step and try and develop what *you* think is your USP. You are new and unique and only you should be your own appraiser. Judge what you can do-- try it-- even if you fail, you'll be stepping forward in the right direction.

The line "Not for nothing, one character, one fact, makes much notion on him, and another none." sort of sums up the theme. It means that you are unique and a have certain fire that no one else has because, by observation you can see that one character or art seems to appeal to you a lot and another one doesn't.

You heed to a song and look at a picture. Both classics; but the song touches your soul while the picture doesn't have that effect. Some other actually may enjoy the picture and may not like the song that much. It just means that you have a taste in music and you should go with your inclination to find your true self. Forcing paintings or anything on yourself is a suicide for your harmonious self.

I hope this answer helped. If this answer worked, you won't be overly impressed with me but must be working towards reading the endeavour by yourself and finding the meaning as it sounds true to yourself and not me or anyone else.

Note: You can find the whole essay at emersoncentral.com. Here is the link- http://www.emersoncentral.com/selfreliance.htm

Allowable luck!


I would put it this way from Admiral "Bull" Halsey. "There are no grand men, just great circumstances to be met by ordinary men."


Ralph Waldo Emerson is talking about people (he says "man," but he extraordinarily means "everybody") who finally realize that they have to be "self-reliant." A actually should finally realize that if he envys somebody else, that is being ignorant, or if he imitates someone else, that is like suicide. What is better is to finally recognize oneself, for better or worse, and be content with that.

Even though the universe might be filled with good, nothing will come to a person "at most because," but he has to work hard for it and finally get it for himself. A person does not know what he is capable of until he goes out and tries to do things on his own.

Isn't that a terrific reproof for everybody? I think it can help a person look at themselves and encourage them to try their best. Good luck!


Hi hkolya,

I felicitate you on your great choice for reading! The emphasis in this paragraph and the paragraph before it (if you read the whole essay) is upon discovering your original self and sticking to your own lifelike thoughts.

When you observe an artistic creation-- whether it be a poem, an essay or any other "new" thought, you, in your heart of hearts, first have to acquiesce in with it to be impressed by it. This implies that you knew this thought beforehand but were afraid to express it.

It is not that you are not capable of new thoughts. Emerson says that a aptitude lies within everyone but, to bring out that genius, one first has to stand up to the contemporary geniuses. Most of us are afraid to listen to the genius within ourselves. We just hark to to what the leaders and intellectuals tell us and believe without questioning.

When a poet says- "Love is a sweet pang." It is *his* viewpoint but, you, even if your heart tells you otherwise, get "boxed" and "caged" into the poetaster's lyrics. The thoughts of love being "a bitter ecstasy" or "a sour smile" or anything else don't intersect your mind. This makes you somewhat incapable of coming up with a love-poems and expressions of your own.

I wrote the above dialogue to mention you to the theme of the paragraph quoted by you. Actually, the above is an explanation of the preceding paragraph. Now, let's come to the text in question-

In everyone's follower life, there comes a time when he realizes that he cannot be like anyone else; that he (or she) is different from others and in that sense, is completely unique.

"Enviousness is ignorance" means that trying to be someone is ignorance. You can only envy someone's good qualities if you are devoid of the knowledge that you cannot be him and he cannot be you.

"Emulating is suicide" means that when you imitate or copy someone, it is like killing your own self. When you try to be someone else; you try to write like someone even though you skilled in that you can express it better in painting, you are killing the painter within you. It is a suicide to imitate someone.

You should learn to live with your good and bad qualities. You have to take it that you are what you are. You cannot be someone else and then, work towards "self" improvement. To improve yourself, you first need to know yourself. The qualities you have are like a conceive of land given to you. You have to work hard keeping in mind the degree of fertility of your plot of land i.e. your disposition.

To grow high-quality cobs of corn (talent), you first have to know your land (basic personal traits).

No one else can adjudicate what you can do with yourself. It is for you to take the first step and try and develop what *you* think is your USP. You are new and unique and only you should be your own judge. Judge what you can do-- try it-- even if you fail, you'll be stepping forward in the right regulation.

The line "Not for nothing, one character, one fact, makes much impression on him, and another none." sort of sums up the theme. It means that you are unsurpassed and a have certain fire that no one else has because, by observation you can see that one character or art seems to appeal to you a lot and another one doesn't.

You listen to a song and look at a picture. Both classics; but the tale touches your soul while the picture doesn't have that effect. Some other person may enjoy the picture and may not like the song that much. It unprejudiced means that you have a taste in music and you should go with your inclination to find your true self. Forcing paintings or anything on yourself is a suicide for your musical self.

I confidence this answer helped. If this answer worked, you won't be overly impressed with me but must be working towards reading the essay by yourself and finding the substance as it sounds true to yourself and not me or anyone else.

Note: You can find the whole essay at emersoncentral.com. Here is the link- http://www.emersoncentral.com/selfreliance.htm

Good good break!

Is there a type of software that I can enter words/literature into & create an audio file to hear my notes?

I don't punctiliousness if it's a monotone robot voice. I'd just like to be able to study on my long drives to and from school and to and from drudgery.


USE A Strap RECORDER, I USE ONE TO RECORD MY TUTORS LESSONS

Do long complicated sentences and multiple difficult words make it great literature?

The hard with reading fiction other than Crime and Romance is that the syntax of sentences is too comlpicated; Sentences are too long -spanning 4-5-6 lines and there are multiple words per sheet that if you looked up each time in dictionary you will spend equal time looking up and reading.

I am fairly intelligent. I have situation graduate training and my vocalulary is better than most people I know -my guess is at least 25,000, 30,000 words - but I am still having this difficulty!
If I have obstacle reading these works of Roth, Updike and Bellow my guess is that 95% of readers do.

So my question is: is it a prerequisite of 'stupendous' literature to be difficult to read? Do the authors do this deliberately or is this their natural flow of language - when they talk in everyday conversation, do they talk in sentences 50-75 words crave? Do they automatically discard 97% population from their potential readers and just don't care to communicate with average Joes?


No, I don't about being difficult to read is a prerequisite of "great" literature, but I think some great literature can be difficult for us to read today. We consider differently, act differently, talk and communicate differently than even people 20-30 years ago. Think about the impact of the Internet, e-send and text messaging are having on our styles of communicating. Also our very busy crammed full life styles where we expect everything to be easygoing and quick impacts our communication and writing.

I think great characters with whom the reader can identify, great plots that equalize reality and the suspension of disbelief and a writing style that flows and is enjoyable (not necessarily easy) to read be suitable for great literature.

I do have a suggestion for you though, as I have recently taken up reading "the classics" myself. I had a very difficult time at first also. I started out reading each soft-cover twice. I would read it the first time, skimming over parts, words, etc... I did not immediately grasp. Instead I would try to get the general sensible of for the book and understand the plot line. The next time I would take more care and really read the book, sometimes re-reading a paragraph or determination a few time or looking back at earlier passages to make sense of the current passage. I also would read many books by the same creator. We know that each author has their own writing style and after about 1 1/2 books I would find myself reading in the "rhythm" of their splendour and it was much easier to read their books then. One more thing, find books with through end notes and use them prodigiously!

When writing "Swiss Army Knife" in a piece of literature, which words should be capitalized?

Should all three words be capitalized, or honest "Swiss" and "Army"?


I'd do all three words. It's a registered trademark, after all.

Matthew Arnold said that literature is "at bottom, a criticism of life." What does that mean in other words?



I think about that Literature is often a mirror for what is going on in society and a vechicle to change that which we dont like.

Many books today use thier pages to put forth venereal commentary. They reflect the issues of the time, including race, class, morals, etc.

All these issues that make up and sham our life are explored, examined, reaffirmed, broken down, rejeted, accepted, and revised through global narrative discussions in liturature.